For amplify-and-forward (AF) relaying with imperfect channel estimation, we present the average symbol error rate (SER) and the diversity and multiplexing tradeoff (DMT) analysis for both opportunistic relaying (OPR) and all-participate relaying (APR) schemes. SER comparisons show that when the channel estimation quality order is no larger than 1, OPR will perform worse than APR in high SNR region. Moreover, small channel estimation quality orders will also lead to significant DMT loss.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Lei WANG, Yueming CAI, Weiwei YANG, "Performance Analysis of Opportunistic and All-Participate Relaying with Imperfect Channel Estimation" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E94-B, no. 11, pp. 3151-3154, November 2011, doi: 10.1587/transcom.E94.B.3151.
Abstract: For amplify-and-forward (AF) relaying with imperfect channel estimation, we present the average symbol error rate (SER) and the diversity and multiplexing tradeoff (DMT) analysis for both opportunistic relaying (OPR) and all-participate relaying (APR) schemes. SER comparisons show that when the channel estimation quality order is no larger than 1, OPR will perform worse than APR in high SNR region. Moreover, small channel estimation quality orders will also lead to significant DMT loss.
URL: https://globals.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.E94.B.3151/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e94-b_11_3151,
author={Lei WANG, Yueming CAI, Weiwei YANG, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Performance Analysis of Opportunistic and All-Participate Relaying with Imperfect Channel Estimation},
year={2011},
volume={E94-B},
number={11},
pages={3151-3154},
abstract={For amplify-and-forward (AF) relaying with imperfect channel estimation, we present the average symbol error rate (SER) and the diversity and multiplexing tradeoff (DMT) analysis for both opportunistic relaying (OPR) and all-participate relaying (APR) schemes. SER comparisons show that when the channel estimation quality order is no larger than 1, OPR will perform worse than APR in high SNR region. Moreover, small channel estimation quality orders will also lead to significant DMT loss.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.E94.B.3151},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={November},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Performance Analysis of Opportunistic and All-Participate Relaying with Imperfect Channel Estimation
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 3151
EP - 3154
AU - Lei WANG
AU - Yueming CAI
AU - Weiwei YANG
PY - 2011
DO - 10.1587/transcom.E94.B.3151
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E94-B
IS - 11
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - November 2011
AB - For amplify-and-forward (AF) relaying with imperfect channel estimation, we present the average symbol error rate (SER) and the diversity and multiplexing tradeoff (DMT) analysis for both opportunistic relaying (OPR) and all-participate relaying (APR) schemes. SER comparisons show that when the channel estimation quality order is no larger than 1, OPR will perform worse than APR in high SNR region. Moreover, small channel estimation quality orders will also lead to significant DMT loss.
ER -