This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M = 3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M = 3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M = 4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Reo KOBAYASHI, Teruo KAWAMURA, Nobuhiko MIKI, Mamoru SAWAHASHI, "Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E95-B, no. 12, pp. 3719-3727, December 2012, doi: 10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719.
Abstract: This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M = 3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M = 3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M = 4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.
URL: https://globals.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e95-b_12_3719,
author={Reo KOBAYASHI, Teruo KAWAMURA, Nobuhiko MIKI, Mamoru SAWAHASHI, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric},
year={2012},
volume={E95-B},
number={12},
pages={3719-3727},
abstract={This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M = 3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M = 3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M = 4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={December},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 3719
EP - 3727
AU - Reo KOBAYASHI
AU - Teruo KAWAMURA
AU - Nobuhiko MIKI
AU - Mamoru SAWAHASHI
PY - 2012
DO - 10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E95-B
IS - 12
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - December 2012
AB - This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M = 3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M = 3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M = 4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.
ER -