The maintenance of a system on a ship has limitations when the ship is engaged in a voyage because of limited maintenance resources. When a system fails, it is either repaired instantly on ship with probability p or remains unrepaired during the voyage with probability 1-p owing to the lack of maintenance resources. In the latter case, the system is repaired after the voyage. We propose two management policies for the overhaul interval of an IFR system: one manages the overhaul interval by number of voyages and the other manages it by the total voyage time. Our goal is to determine the optimal policy that ensures the required availability of the system and minimizes the expected cost rate.
Tomohiro KITAGAWA
National Defense Academy
Tetsushi YUGE
National Defense Academy
Shigeru YANAGI
National Defense Academy
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Tomohiro KITAGAWA, Tetsushi YUGE, Shigeru YANAGI, "Maintenance Modeling for a System Equipped on Ship" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals,
vol. E100-A, no. 2, pp. 629-638, February 2017, doi: 10.1587/transfun.E100.A.629.
Abstract: The maintenance of a system on a ship has limitations when the ship is engaged in a voyage because of limited maintenance resources. When a system fails, it is either repaired instantly on ship with probability p or remains unrepaired during the voyage with probability 1-p owing to the lack of maintenance resources. In the latter case, the system is repaired after the voyage. We propose two management policies for the overhaul interval of an IFR system: one manages the overhaul interval by number of voyages and the other manages it by the total voyage time. Our goal is to determine the optimal policy that ensures the required availability of the system and minimizes the expected cost rate.
URL: https://globals.ieice.org/en_transactions/fundamentals/10.1587/transfun.E100.A.629/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e100-a_2_629,
author={Tomohiro KITAGAWA, Tetsushi YUGE, Shigeru YANAGI, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals},
title={Maintenance Modeling for a System Equipped on Ship},
year={2017},
volume={E100-A},
number={2},
pages={629-638},
abstract={The maintenance of a system on a ship has limitations when the ship is engaged in a voyage because of limited maintenance resources. When a system fails, it is either repaired instantly on ship with probability p or remains unrepaired during the voyage with probability 1-p owing to the lack of maintenance resources. In the latter case, the system is repaired after the voyage. We propose two management policies for the overhaul interval of an IFR system: one manages the overhaul interval by number of voyages and the other manages it by the total voyage time. Our goal is to determine the optimal policy that ensures the required availability of the system and minimizes the expected cost rate.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transfun.E100.A.629},
ISSN={1745-1337},
month={February},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Maintenance Modeling for a System Equipped on Ship
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SP - 629
EP - 638
AU - Tomohiro KITAGAWA
AU - Tetsushi YUGE
AU - Shigeru YANAGI
PY - 2017
DO - 10.1587/transfun.E100.A.629
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SN - 1745-1337
VL - E100-A
IS - 2
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Y1 - February 2017
AB - The maintenance of a system on a ship has limitations when the ship is engaged in a voyage because of limited maintenance resources. When a system fails, it is either repaired instantly on ship with probability p or remains unrepaired during the voyage with probability 1-p owing to the lack of maintenance resources. In the latter case, the system is repaired after the voyage. We propose two management policies for the overhaul interval of an IFR system: one manages the overhaul interval by number of voyages and the other manages it by the total voyage time. Our goal is to determine the optimal policy that ensures the required availability of the system and minimizes the expected cost rate.
ER -