Two ways of introducing alternation for context-free grammars and pushdown automata are compared. One is the usual way which combines "states" with alternation [1], [4], [7], and the other is the way used in [6] to define the alternating context-free grammar, i.e., alternation is governed by the variables of the grammar. In this paper the latter way is taken over to define a new type of alternating pushdown automaton by combining the "pushdown symbols" of the pushdown automaton with alternation. We have derived a characterization of the original alternating context-free grammars in terms of such a new type of alternating pushdown automaton without states. It is also shown that, if (non-alternating) states are introduced as an additional feature for this type of pushdown automaton, then the resulting alternating pushdown automaton has exactly the same expressive power as the original alternating pushdown automaton.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Etsuro MORIYA, Friedrich OTTO, "Two Ways of Introducing Alternation into Context-Free Grammars and Pushdown Automata" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E90-D, no. 6, pp. 889-894, June 2007, doi: 10.1093/ietisy/e90-d.6.889.
Abstract: Two ways of introducing alternation for context-free grammars and pushdown automata are compared. One is the usual way which combines "states" with alternation [1], [4], [7], and the other is the way used in [6] to define the alternating context-free grammar, i.e., alternation is governed by the variables of the grammar. In this paper the latter way is taken over to define a new type of alternating pushdown automaton by combining the "pushdown symbols" of the pushdown automaton with alternation. We have derived a characterization of the original alternating context-free grammars in terms of such a new type of alternating pushdown automaton without states. It is also shown that, if (non-alternating) states are introduced as an additional feature for this type of pushdown automaton, then the resulting alternating pushdown automaton has exactly the same expressive power as the original alternating pushdown automaton.
URL: https://globals.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1093/ietisy/e90-d.6.889/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e90-d_6_889,
author={Etsuro MORIYA, Friedrich OTTO, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={Two Ways of Introducing Alternation into Context-Free Grammars and Pushdown Automata},
year={2007},
volume={E90-D},
number={6},
pages={889-894},
abstract={Two ways of introducing alternation for context-free grammars and pushdown automata are compared. One is the usual way which combines "states" with alternation [1], [4], [7], and the other is the way used in [6] to define the alternating context-free grammar, i.e., alternation is governed by the variables of the grammar. In this paper the latter way is taken over to define a new type of alternating pushdown automaton by combining the "pushdown symbols" of the pushdown automaton with alternation. We have derived a characterization of the original alternating context-free grammars in terms of such a new type of alternating pushdown automaton without states. It is also shown that, if (non-alternating) states are introduced as an additional feature for this type of pushdown automaton, then the resulting alternating pushdown automaton has exactly the same expressive power as the original alternating pushdown automaton.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1093/ietisy/e90-d.6.889},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={June},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Two Ways of Introducing Alternation into Context-Free Grammars and Pushdown Automata
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 889
EP - 894
AU - Etsuro MORIYA
AU - Friedrich OTTO
PY - 2007
DO - 10.1093/ietisy/e90-d.6.889
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E90-D
IS - 6
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - June 2007
AB - Two ways of introducing alternation for context-free grammars and pushdown automata are compared. One is the usual way which combines "states" with alternation [1], [4], [7], and the other is the way used in [6] to define the alternating context-free grammar, i.e., alternation is governed by the variables of the grammar. In this paper the latter way is taken over to define a new type of alternating pushdown automaton by combining the "pushdown symbols" of the pushdown automaton with alternation. We have derived a characterization of the original alternating context-free grammars in terms of such a new type of alternating pushdown automaton without states. It is also shown that, if (non-alternating) states are introduced as an additional feature for this type of pushdown automaton, then the resulting alternating pushdown automaton has exactly the same expressive power as the original alternating pushdown automaton.
ER -