This paper presents a performance comparison between the single-stream and the multi-stream approaches to lip synchronization of live media (voice and video). The former transmits a single transport stream of interleaved voice and video, while the latter treats the two media as separate transport streams. Each approach has an option not to exert the synchronization control at the destination, which leads to four basic schemes. On an interconnected ATM-wireless LAN, we implemented the four basic schemes with RTP/RTCP on top of UDP and two variants which exercise dynamic resolution control of JPEG video. Making the performance measurement of the six schemes, we compare them to identify and evaluate advantages and disadvantages of each approach. We then show that the performance difference between the two approaches is small and that the dynamic resolution control improves the synchronization quality.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Shuji TASAKA, Yutaka ISHIBASHI, "A Performance Comparison of Single-Stream and Multi-Stream Approaches to Live Media Synchronization" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E81-B, no. 11, pp. 1988-1997, November 1998, doi: .
Abstract: This paper presents a performance comparison between the single-stream and the multi-stream approaches to lip synchronization of live media (voice and video). The former transmits a single transport stream of interleaved voice and video, while the latter treats the two media as separate transport streams. Each approach has an option not to exert the synchronization control at the destination, which leads to four basic schemes. On an interconnected ATM-wireless LAN, we implemented the four basic schemes with RTP/RTCP on top of UDP and two variants which exercise dynamic resolution control of JPEG video. Making the performance measurement of the six schemes, we compare them to identify and evaluate advantages and disadvantages of each approach. We then show that the performance difference between the two approaches is small and that the dynamic resolution control improves the synchronization quality.
URL: https://globals.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/e81-b_11_1988/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e81-b_11_1988,
author={Shuji TASAKA, Yutaka ISHIBASHI, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={A Performance Comparison of Single-Stream and Multi-Stream Approaches to Live Media Synchronization},
year={1998},
volume={E81-B},
number={11},
pages={1988-1997},
abstract={This paper presents a performance comparison between the single-stream and the multi-stream approaches to lip synchronization of live media (voice and video). The former transmits a single transport stream of interleaved voice and video, while the latter treats the two media as separate transport streams. Each approach has an option not to exert the synchronization control at the destination, which leads to four basic schemes. On an interconnected ATM-wireless LAN, we implemented the four basic schemes with RTP/RTCP on top of UDP and two variants which exercise dynamic resolution control of JPEG video. Making the performance measurement of the six schemes, we compare them to identify and evaluate advantages and disadvantages of each approach. We then show that the performance difference between the two approaches is small and that the dynamic resolution control improves the synchronization quality.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={November},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Performance Comparison of Single-Stream and Multi-Stream Approaches to Live Media Synchronization
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 1988
EP - 1997
AU - Shuji TASAKA
AU - Yutaka ISHIBASHI
PY - 1998
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN -
VL - E81-B
IS - 11
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - November 1998
AB - This paper presents a performance comparison between the single-stream and the multi-stream approaches to lip synchronization of live media (voice and video). The former transmits a single transport stream of interleaved voice and video, while the latter treats the two media as separate transport streams. Each approach has an option not to exert the synchronization control at the destination, which leads to four basic schemes. On an interconnected ATM-wireless LAN, we implemented the four basic schemes with RTP/RTCP on top of UDP and two variants which exercise dynamic resolution control of JPEG video. Making the performance measurement of the six schemes, we compare them to identify and evaluate advantages and disadvantages of each approach. We then show that the performance difference between the two approaches is small and that the dynamic resolution control improves the synchronization quality.
ER -